Talk:Items
Idea for the food table
Instead of what we have now, how about something like
| Item | Description | Raw | Cooked | Rotten | Burnt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunger | Thirst | Boredom | Unhappy | Hunger | Thirst | Boredom | Unhappy | Hunger | Thirst | Boredom | Unhappy | Hunger | Thirst | Boredom | Unhappy | ||
|
A lucious red apple that can lift any survivor's hopes. | -30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ? | ? | ? | ? | - | - | - | - |
|
A piece of raw chicken. Better when cooked to avoid sickness. Can cause sickness when eaten raw or rotten. | -40 | - | - | - | -80 | - | -20 | - | -20 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
I'm not sure how, but I think we would be able to make those rows sortable.
- I like it.The instructions for sortable tables should be here - http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Sorting Pianoman 13:36, 15 June 2012 (BST) PzAdmin
- Hm. Seems that you can't make a sorter from a non-top cell... I'll look into it now. Kelenius 17:01, 15 June 2012 (BST)
Idea... Kelenius 17:22, 15 June 2012 (BST)
| Item | Description | Condition | Hunger | Thirst | Boredom | Unhappy | Sickness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
A lucious red apple that can lift any survivor's hopes. | Normal | -30 | - | - | - | No |
| Rotten | ? | ? | ? | ? | Yes | ||
|
|
A piece of raw chicken. Better when cooked to avoid sickness. | Raw | -40 | - | - | - | Yes |
| Cooked | -80 | - | -20 | - | No | ||
| Rotten | -20 | ? | ? | ? | Yes | ||
| Burnt | ? | ? | ? | ? | No |
It gets buggy when you try to sort anything in it. Example on this page is working fine, seems to be different version. Kelenius 17:22, 15 June 2012 (BST)
Maybe
| Item | Description | Condition | Hunger | Thirst | Boredom | Unhappy | Sickness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
A lucious red apple that can lift any survivor's hopes. | Normal | -30 | - | - | - | No |
Rotten Apple |
A rotten red apple. | Rotten | ? | ? | ? | ? | Yes |
With different rows for every condition? Kelenius 17:22, 15 June 2012 (BST)
- That's a possibility. Once I get some "work-at-home" stuff done I'll see if I can take a closer look at the wikimedia instructions. Tables always seem to be one of the most difficult aspect of the wiki unfortunately. I've considered converting to the newest version of the wiki software but it will have to be for a very compelling reason because until I have more experience I will be afraid of totally screwing it up. Thanks! 97.117.52.9 18:01, 15 June 2012 (BST) PzAdmin