User talk:Connall

From PZwiki
Revision as of 00:27, 10 December 2013 by ZombieLawnGnome (talk | contribs) (→‎Code Sections: addendum re: fallback position of my argument against code sections.)

Connall, Agree with your assessment of the Occupations page and links. Go ahead and consolidate away. Pianoman 22:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Could you undo the last change of Template:RecipeLookup ? I somehow cant submit anything... is there some kind of submit limit ? And, well this is also a test whether i can submit or not.


ZombieLawnGnome I added the Ham entry but I couldn't find a good template. I just copied some formatting from the Salmon entry and modified it. The article is rough and could use some review.

28_мая_2011_года

Will try deleting this later. I am getting a database error that may be related to the update of the wiki software to the latest greatest version. I already killed the link from the main page. Pianoman (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

UnPacker

Sharing is enabled now. Is my first time using mediafire ^^. Please tell me if there are any bugs.

Page delete request

There is a duplicate article for beef jerky.

One has a capital J and one doesn't. Recommend deleting the one with the lower-case 'j' as the capital 'J' is the one linked to from the items page.

Code Sections

I saw one of your edits to the wooden chair page. Since there's no stylesheets for the wiki (yet) I have to ask... Why are we adding code snippets to the pages. Seems like we're creating more work and much more overhead keeping the information up to date for no benefit I can ascertain...

Modders the only ones I can even remotely see getting any sort of useful benefit from the the code section, but then they should be referring to the actual code itself, rather than a possibly dated version of the code listed on the wiki.

I can't see any other use case besides idle curiosity, and for that (in my rather worthless opinion) the time would be better spent updating parts of they wiki that everyone will use rather than a small subset of people that shouldn't even be using it anyway.

If you insist on having a code section, my fallback position would be to create a template, using a collapsible table format, that contains the version information the code was taken from, so people would at least know how old the code was.